Are humans or computers better at chess

They can calculate very well (not every time), but positionally somitimes make horroble moves.This i suspect humans are a bit better at than computers.Chess computer engines are currently much stronger than humans.Just don't try to break them down psychologically.I ask of anyone to disprove this statement and further the support the argument that a human with its feeble little mind can compete, and defeat a superhuman chess computer.

Although chess computers today have not yet reached the status of perfect play, they should never lose to a human.Humans won 148 ½ points.A human will never be able to beat the best chess engines ai or computers.History of chess computers computers have been playing chess since 1957 when they beat the first human in a match.Computers won 151 ½ points.

It'll be interesting to check out a game between a grand master and the best software in ten years' time if the trend of stronger play continues.In an interview with fivethirtyeight, deep blue developer murray campbell says the depth of preparation allowed by computers may lead to more draws.And, unlike people, computers love to retreat, soltis says.While humans may be more creative than a chess computer, they cannot compete with the speed and accuracy with which the new chess computers analyze their games.Carlsen is not better at chess than a computer because no human mind can keep up with a chess computer that is using maximum analytical capacity.

In the early tournaments, humans won more games.Human chess players bring preconceptions to the board;Generally, chess computers are better than humans;